I would like to present you two models of work that would help you monitor the status of a project from idea to completion. These are Kanban and Scrum.
Both Scrum and Kanban use the Agile methodology to track the state of the project from idea to completion: setting specific goals, delegating tasks and preparing a workflow. Reference: “Scrum and Kanban: similarities and differences“, https://www.policymatters.net/scrum-and-kanban-similarities-and-differences/
To understand the difference in the easiest way, imagine the following:
Kanban is like a basketball game where the completed task is equal to one point and the team tries to minimize the time between shots.
Kanban is a visual work management system. Imagine a whiteboard with several columns with a certain number of yellow task sheets and each of them has to go through all the columns successfully from “to do” to “done”.
If you use this method correctly, your team would win the workflow to run smoothly at optimal speed. If you do not change the board constantly, you can cause problems in the development process. Lack of time is another drawback, as there are no time frames associated with each phase.
As for Scrum, it’s like a school test: you have to complete a set of tasks over a period of time. And no other activities are allowed.
Scrum is most often used in a project where requirements change rapidly. That’s why you have relevant roles and meetings to know who is responsible for what and when. You must have a Product Owner (Score Master), a Scrum Master and a Development team. Together you will have meetings where you have to see what has been done and what needs to be done, to plan the tasks and to reflect on the whole process of a maximum of 30 days. More on the topic: https://customessaysonline.net/
I recommend it if you work on more complex projects, love meetings and work in a team. But before that, it is good to get acquainted with the whole process.
I do not recommend it if you are not familiar with Scrum at all or do not have the above positions.
In conclusion, a lot depends on your teams and your ultimate goals. I hope I have explained to you in the simplest way the difference between the two models and I hope you are familiar enough to make a decision as a team. Ask yourself if you have complex processes to solve, if you often make last-minute changes, or if you just want a neat board with concrete small tasks that anyone can follow through the process from start to run.
Choosing and applying methods such as Kanban, Scrum or Waterfall requires very good knowledge not only of how to work, but also of the teams themselves. It is very important to know the composition of the team before deciding which model to use for work. Also, a lot depends on the final product that needs to be made by the teams.
When choosing the Waterfall way of working, we must be aware that many of the operations and tasks must be performed consistently. Most project parameters are pre-defined, approved and signed, such as costs, budget, project scope, requirements, staff, events, quality and benefits.
1. In order to successfully apply this model of work and achieve the appropriate goal, one of the most important qualities of the team is impeccably good planning and preparation of a comprehensive plan as business value.
As Waterfall is a linear way of working, the process must be planned and documented from the very beginning without expecting major changes in the future. In construction, this model of work is often used. Therefore, teams must have very good planning skills.
2. Another important quality of the team that would add business value to the project is the avoidance of unnecessary documents, processes and communications. As everything important will be described from the very beginning of the project, the team contributes by reducing unnecessary conversations and conflicts, which would save time and worries at work.
3. A third quality of the team as added business value is that costs are managed and planned carefully from the very beginning, which leads to the elimination of unexpected surcharges. Because they are described from the beginning, all stakeholders and managers will know what to expect and can allocate the budget properly. More on the topic: https://www.muzonet.com/
1. When talking about the added business value of the management department in the Waterfall method, it is essential that the manager seeks constant communication with each member of the team so that he can understand what difficulties they experience during the work process. This initiative from them would create new work processes to facilitate the people who develop the product.
2. The project manager is the main person in each team of the Waterfall model. He is responsible for the quality of the final software and his main task is to manage projects and distribute tasks among other team members. These are the actions that add business value to the project.
3. Management roles can also offer various courses for people who want to develop to higher positions. In this way the development in the department and the knowledge is stimulated.
Among all these qualities and actions, there are additional initiatives that the organization can organize to add extra business value to the project. Here they are:
1. The organization can do a survey for each member of the project to find out how people feel and what they would like to change in the future. This will allow appropriate measures to be taken to make the company’s employees feel better.
2. Periodic meetings or general entertainment for all teams that can be organized by senior management would add value to the project. In this way, people would get to know each other much better outside the work environment and will definitely improve a good work environment and process.
3. The organization can also initiate various bonus systems to motivate people. When the team has an additional incentive to work through a bonus or additional social benefits, it will motivate them, at least most of them, which will again lead to an automatic increase in the value of the business.
References
- References: “The differences between Scrum and Kanban methods of working in Agile projects“, https://www.kievpress.info/differences-between-scrum-and-kanban-agile/
- Reference: “Waterfall, Agile, Scrum and Kanban methodologies“, https://stc-montreal.org/waterfall-agile-scrum-and-kanban-methodologies/
- Reference: “Working on projects with Scrum and Kanban: which to choose from both“, https://eduwiki.me/projects-with-scrum-and-kanban-which-to-choose/
- Reference: “Waterfall vs V-Model vs Scrum vs Kanban”, https://newia.info/waterfall-vs-v-model-vs-scrum-vs-kanban/